Installing New Welding Machines? The GSS may be less expensive
than a quality conventional Gas Delivery Hose! See Notes Below for
Comparison. |
Notes:
-
Retail Price Comparison of fitted GSS
compared with Heavy Duty fitted gas hose from a major welding manufacturer (Brand name and part
numbers available on request), The Heavy Duty hose was selected for comparison
rather than cheap vinyl hose since it at least has fiber reinforced, abrasion
resistant construction like the GSS
hose, even though it provides none of the gas waste or surge reduction
benefits. The GSS
hose also has a better OD to ID size
ratio than conventional hoses providing greater resistance to restriction when
the hose is subjected to crushing, pinching or being stepped on.
* Brand name 12 1/2 foot HD
prefitted hose = $63.10 (no gas saving or weld quality benefits)
* GSS
12 foot prefitted hose = $65.00 (Slightly higher but payback is
very quick)
* Brand name 25 foot HD prefitted
hose = $114.30 (no gas saving or weld quality benefits!)
* GSS
25 foot prefitted hose = < $110.00 (The GSS is less expensive
"Just
Do It!" -Want Brand Name, Part Number?
Email
|
-
Very Conservative Assumptions
used in calculations:
* Shielding gas savings estimated
at only 25% when all reported results are between 30 to 63%
* Gas usage assumed to be 2 1/2
times theoretical with published data showing a range from 2 1/2
to 5 times is what is used in industry
* Flow rate set for 35 CFH
* One shift operation and 40 hour
work week.
* Price of
GSS based on 12 & 25 foot systems as noted; however longer
hoses waste more gas which usually offsets their higher price.
* Short welds and/or the use of
many tack welds will increase waste reduction beyond 25%,
decreasing payback time.
* Reduced time to change cylinders
not included in calculations.
*All weekly payback values rounded
up to higher number.
|
-
% Arc Time = amount of time in a
work day welding is actually occurring versus the 8 hour work day -- stated as a
percentage.
|
Other
Cost Savings also result from fewer
cylinders being used over a fixed period of time. A recent
article by a manufacturer of shielding gases defined the benefits of using
what is referred to as Microbulk gas distribution. It commented on the extra
cost associated with cylinder use.
One cost benefit defined was less cylinder handling. It mentioned
cylinder handling can result in 20 minutes of extra labor per change-out. It
also mentioned each cylinder often has residual gas left in it, up to 20%.
That is gas paid for and not used.
If the GSS reduces gas usage
by 50% these cost for these items will also be cut in half. |
Purchase Gas Saver
System |
Conservative Payback
Calculations for Flow Rate Limiter
For Both:
WAT-FRL (Without Lock) &
WAT-FRLL (With Lock)
|
Assumptions:
- Work week = 40 hours for 1 shift
- Welding has 40% duty cycle; i.e. arc is on 40% of the time
- Shielding Gas Flow Desired = 35 ft3/hr
- Without Flow Rate Limiter flow is set 15 ft3/hr higher
than needed or at 50 ft3/hr.
- Shielding gas cost $5.00/100CF = $0.05/ ft3
|
Gas Waste Calculation:
Waste = (50 ft3/hr - 35
ft3/hr) x 40 hr/week x 40% arc-on-time x $0.05/ ft3 =
$12.00/week gas waste per welder |
Payback for WAT-FRL
= $35.00
unit cost / $12.00/week savings = 2.9 weeks Payback |
Payback for WAT-FRLL = $47.50
unit cost / $12.00/week savings = 3.9 weeks Payback |
BOTTOM LINE-With Average
Assumptions, Payback is Less Than 1 Month |

Gas Saving
Products |

Purchase Training Aids |

Purchase Orifice Flow Control
System |

Purchase
Flow Rate Limiter |

Purchase Wire Feeding Aids |